EcoHeart for Life

I have a few posts about living through the Heart and not the Ego. Unfortunately this is not one of my favorite subjects because it is vague and opaque, and of interest to only a few people. Many people are naturally turned off by alternative ideas about a different and possibly better way of living that does not follow how they live now. It goes against their lifetime of experience. It goes against the grain of their lifetime.

However I will eventually go down that avenue. We need to raise our awareness and responsibilities to each other and the soil we live on. Living through your heart keeps life choices simple. Choices made when living through your heart are arrived at with respect and responsibility. Decisions made through the Heart are made for all living things on this earth and the Earth itself.

Many people find new ideas or ways of thinking silly, non existent, something only for crackpots, or evil. I was one of those people. I spent over half my life thinking these types of people were dropped on their heads at birth or had some other problem that made them abnormal. I too thought their ideas were between over reacting to silly and did not apply to my life. What is wrong with these people anyway!

There was nothing wrong with the way everyone lived when I was a young boy. The Earth was ours to do with what we wanted, and the Earth would be okay. Sunday School Teachers and my regular School Teachers told me this was so. Dangerous chemicals being sprayed with abandon would break down quickly into harmless states. Garbage and other waste would decompose back into rich earth. Air was cleaned and refreshed and made wholesome by thunder and lightning storms.

My Teacher told us about something called Acid Rain. A few years after that I was told about DDT. It was okay because it was happening somewhere else, not where I lived. They fogged streets in the area and the kids would play in the fog. It was harmless fun, and no parent thought it was really harmful. After all it was a mosquito killer called DDT. What could be wrong with an insecticide that killed mosquitoes?

No matter where we live, we all live on one marble we call EarthTeachers told us we should not drink water from the lakes we swam in and local creeks we played in. That water in these places was now a sewage path full of poop and pee, and other household wastes from houses built next to the lakes, creeks and wetlands. We were told the foam in the water was not “Sea Foam” as we kids believed, but detergent from cleaners and laundry products.

Teachers said water in the creeks and streams where I lived in Minnesota were not the clean or healthy water it looked like to us. None of us kids believed that line either. We thought or decided Teachers were exaggerating, making it worse than it really was. We kids were sure Teacher’s did not want us to have any fun. Teacher’s thought it was dangerous swimming in lakes without lifeguards and this was their way of keeping us safe.

Where I lived in rural Minnesota everything was peachy keen. Those problems happened somewhere else. “Sea Foam” had been present in the water since I could remember (all of five to ten years of memories), and I was told it was Sea Foam by Adults, so that must be what it was. I never saw anyone use the bathroom in the water either from those houses.

A year later our Teachers started telling us not to eat snow any more. Because of Nuclear Weapons testing, and Air Pollution, whatever that was, snow and rain was no longer safe for us kids to eat. We did not believe that story either. When I was a kid eating snow was a rite of being outside in the winter, as was catching rain in our mouth in the summer

I believed my teachers were telling tall tales until I stepped on a large turd in waist deep water while swimming at the lake one sunny July day. Scraping someone’s crap off my foot, I realized the lake really was nothing more than a huge septic tank. My Teachers were right. I no longer wanted to eat fish from that lake or most other lakes and streams with houses around them.

Most adults who thought we could live that way forever were very wrong. Those few Teachers and other people like them had the ability to see beyond their lifetime what the world would be like if we did not change how we lived. They were dreamers with vision. These few people correctly imagined our future if we did not change how we were living.

 


Share

Lethal Injection to Global Warming to Dune

I was reading a very well thought out and well presented blog post arguing Lethal Injection. When I read something serious I read first to understand, and then weigh what is being said, while keeping any rebuttals on the side. I could not find any place to rebuttal, it was excellent writing. I am sure many writers around the world wish they could think, and write as well as the author did.

After I left the blog, a thought started in my mind about the future of the human race and if Lethal Injection will be needed in another century. I think what started this thought was just a few minutes earlier I was scanning the television channels, and saw Dune was showing. Dune is a sixties sci-fi movie from a book series that takes place in the year 10190 on a planet far far away from here.

It was the date that started me thinking. In the sixties people were worrying about the world too. They were worried about the pesticides being used, and how we were killing our way up the food chain because they did not break down. The closer the pesticides came to ourselves, the more concentrated they were in the animal that became food at that level. The California Condor led the way on the protection list, as it looked like we had killed it off forever.

Frank Herbert wrote the Dune series during this time, and that is what had me thinking about the future first. Here we were killing off our planet and Frank Herbert was writing a book that takes place some eight thousand years in the future. He must have had access to more optimism at that time than most people did.

Back to the Lethal Injection blog entry, and the global warming thought that jumped into my thinking. I wonder if we are being too limited by thinking about global warming, and global warming only? Maybe we are letting our scope of focus be too small?

Perhaps if we plan on being around to see the year 10190 come to pass maybe it is time to think a little larger than just the global warming issue? We in our smugness as the most advanced brain on the planet have a problem with our individual ego’s. It is possible that global warming could wipe out the human race, every little bit of it, and most of the other life on our earth.

Our ego’s do not let us see this fact, we like to think if global warming does us in collectively the world stops turning, and the lights go out. Not so I am afraid, if we cease to exist something will survive. Even if it is a specialized bacteria that feeds on volcanic sand, something will survive.

I am thinking that we need to take this time to think about our future, regardless of whether global warming is caused by humans or not. We have had some pretty big scares as a world since we have become so ‘advanced’ in our science. There is no need to generate a list of scares. No matter what your world concerns are, there are many lists and arguments supporting both sides of the worlds major concerns.

If the worlds population in general thinks there is no problem, and we will be here in the year,10190, good for us. If the world decides we need to start tending our world a little better than we have been, good for us too. I think we are being too narrow in our focus of one BIG issue when we have environmental disasters waiting to happen all over the world.

We are already tending our world in a way because we are the voice for most of the worlds population already. Those countries that are plugged in and turned on, are making decisions that effect us all. Will we be here in the year 10190, or will Frank Herbert’s future sci-fi vision and words be returned to the earth because no one will be alive to read them?

Share