Dreams come true from well formed plans

If my memory has not jumbled this story up…In one of Carlos Castaneda’s early books, Don Juan tells Castaneda that a witch down the road is planning to attack him, and he needs to stop her before she hurts him. Castaneda is scared, and does not know what to do. Don Juan plays on those fears and drives Castaneda to take some action concerning the witch down the road. Later on, if I have the sequence correct, Castaneda asks Don Juan what he would do if he were on a street, in a city and there was a man with a rifle waiting to kill him. Don Juan laughs, and say’s something to the effect of, he would not be on that street to start with.

Unlike the enemy Don Juan may have created, many of us are our own assassins. We rarely need anyone’s help to ruin our plans. We do it ourselves with some frequency. We meet someone special, we want a different job, any number of things that we start to plan out, and suddenly it all blows up without warning. Or does it? In Castaneda’s book, Don Juan said he would not be on the street to start with. What could Don Juan know that we do not?

Don Juan knew many things about human nature that most do not, and this was only one of them. Don Juan knew that many of us we get stuck in a rut we call our life. We claim we do not like where how we live, what we do, and talk about how we are going to change. Changing, and talking about changing are two completely different things. I think that is what Don Juan knew. Unless, as in Castaneda’s case where he really felt his very life was threatened, he would have normally taken no action to help himself.

I listened to a couple eating at a fast food place last week. They were poor, looking at their clothing which was worn, and frayed. The man was telling the woman that he was planning on going to Las Vegas, to gamble, and become rich. He went on to say that it would probably take him about a year and a half to get rich. He thought she could stay where she was until he returned. Of course when he returned things may have changed. She would probably be on Welfare. Possibly hooked up with another guy (his words). What would he do then? Would she be willing to leave the guy to be with him once he returned rich? Perhaps he would run into a women, and he would not want her any more – that also was possible (his words). With the conversation half finished, and bristling with possibilities, they left.

As crazy as that conversation sounds, some of us make plans like that all the time. We dream our plans, and never live our dream, because something falls apart. For that couple, I doubt he will ever find his way out of town, let alone to Las Vegas. Not because he was not capable, but because his plans are built on the same sand of everyones who’s plans blow up without reason. They are not really plans, they are simply a string of events tied together by hot air.

We all need dreams in our life. We also need good planning so we can have the best possible life. I think we need to keep the two somewhat separate so we can achieve our dreams, instead of dreaming about our achievements that have never come to pass. We are capable of so much more if we give our self a chance with real plans, and realistic dreams.

As an old dinner house cook once told me. Plan your work, work you plan, and clean up as you go. In the case of our lives, it would be: Plan your dream, work your plan, and repeat as you go. Happy dreaming!

Share

Shamanism, core Shamanism, Christianity, and what is that?

I was reading a blog entry today about Shamanism which frustrated me. The writer of the blog definitely has their own ideas, and their own agenda. (No surprise there, I suppose.) Shamanism is not a religion, it is probably best described as one way of interacting with the world. Shamanism or Shamanistic practices is found in every major religion that I know of. So what has me riled up about the bog entry? Let me start from the beginning.

I am googling around, and I come across this blog as I said. I do not wish to attack the blog entry, or its author, so let me move the subject to a different topic, say Christianity? Just kidding, how about a card game, say some version of the card game Rummy? That sounds pretty safe to use Rummy for an analogy.

Okay, now you have to pretend you know, and maybe you do, that there are many variations of the card game Rummy. One day, an anthropologist with a fascination for the game of Rummy, decided to write a book about Rummy. The would be author finds many variations of Rummy. If they were all covered, the book would become so fractured and disjointed that no matter how it was written it would not be easy for the reader to understand.

After giving it some thought, the wanna be author finds a solution to his problem. The wanna be author will write about those parts of Rummy that all Rummy variations share. What a brilliant idea! Once the book is written there will always be a written core form of Rummy that is present no matter how it is played. If a Rummy game does not contain some of the core parts of Rummy shared in all other Rummy games, it is not a variation of Rummy, period.

This is a very simple and elegant solution to a complex problem. This same process could be applied to major religions around the world, how businesses are managed, almost anything that has more than one way of being done. All these things could be distilled down to basic parts that are common in the many parts.

Sounds pretty good having a book containing the core of something no matter how it is done? I thought it is pretty effective and quite smart too. So what is the rub? The rub is the same as it is everywhere, power and control. The blog author has decided that a book on core generic practices of Shamanism can not possibly be correct. What is correct in the authors opinion is Shamanism should only be practiced the way the blog author thinks it should be.

The details of this practice are a work in development, but contains little to no core Shamanism practices. If a Shamanistic practice does not contain portions of core Shamanism, then it is something else masquerading as Shamanism.

Christianity is a lot like the card game Rummy in some respects. Just like Rummy, Christianity has so many variations that I do not know how many variations exist. Each of these variations of Christianity feel they are the real deal, and the rest are some sort of knock off. But they all share some or most of the many core ideas found in Christianity.

So, Christianity can not be Christianity if you leave certain essentials like Christ out of the picture. The argument stating – the Shamanism the blog author is developing is correct, and any previous form of Shamanism is wrong – is clouded thinking. Just like Christianity, you can not leave out the core aspects Shamanism, and call it Shamanism. I see this author’s thinking as no different than entering a theatre in the second act of a play, stopping the play, and telling the actors they have it all wrong.

Whatever a person chooses to think, or not think is a correct personal choice. Once that thinking extends to what one, or a group of people claim is correct, and everyone else is wrong, is definitely wrong. Stating that core shared practices that have been used for thousands of years are wrong, and only a still developing system not using Shamanistic technique is right, is a different matter completely, and wrong in any format. This applies to Shamanism, Christianity, or any other major religion.

Share