Gnosticism and three pound dogs

Speaking with a friend the other day, the topic of beliefs and those things that are part of beliefs. The next day I started thinking about the ideas we shared and our diverse experiences from our very different lives.

Later my as thoughts drifted I remembered reading about someone who defined themselves a Gnostic. The distinction was not clear to me what a gnostic was. Since then some disparate topics have crossed my path which clarified what the person who claimed Gnosticism was really saying. If you are like me, understanding what a gnostic is was kind of fuzzy.

One unrelated at the time documentary that crossed my path was the true story of William Peter Blatty’s book, and later movie, The Exorcist. There were other stories revolving around exorcism, and people who consider themselves exorcists also in the documentary. It was interesting side note wondering why possession happens at all, but was dismissed from the process in the documentary.

We humans are the only species that we know of who doubt. If you have ever been around dogs when they come into contact with a dog they have never met before, you may notice something interesting if you pay close attention. Neither dog knows or thinks for a second that is or may be inferior to the other dog.

If one dog is over a hundred pounds, and the second dog is three pounds it does not matter. In the world of dogs they are evenly matched. The smaller dog never for a moment realizes that it may be a distant second in the weight department. The smaller dog will start a fight with the larger dog if the initial meeting does not pan out as expected.

Many of us on the other hand live by different rules. When we see someone we are meeting for the first time, we start processing information about them. We start categorizing our perceptions, and pass judgement on how they compare. We have already classified the other person before we even touch hands and say hello. We then continue reinforce our first impressions.

The contrast between ourselves, other animals, and a gnostic is interesting from this perspective. The definition of Gnostic is “of or relating to knowledge, esp. esoteric mystical knowledge”. Dogs, the same as gnostics seem to know, or have have access to knowledge some of us do not.

Someone who lives life from a position of gnosticism is more likely to be successful no matter what the platform they do with their life. The person who considers themselves a gnostic is no different from the three pound dog in how they think.

The three pound dog when it meets a larger dog for the first time never thinks for a moment that it may be inferior, wrong, or otherwise less than the larger dog. In our human world, most Shamans, Exorcists, some Priests, Witches, even successful Gamblers never for an instant consider they may not have all the knowledge and tools they need to be successful in the moment.

While we as individuals may not be drawn to the arcane, occult, or mystical knowledge of one of the above people. It is imperative to know that just like a Gnostic, or the three pound dog, we have everything we need to be successful. All we need is the mustard seed.

Losing the mustard seed is the problem. I am always in awe of how so many of us lose something so easy to hold on to. Maybe it is the small size of a mustard seed. Perhaps we are so entrenched in the physical world, we fail to understand or appreciate how something so small and insubstantial as having the faith of a mustard seed can mean everything in our life?

Having faith in yourself and your abilities means never having to doubt you are enough, or prepared enough to be successful in any situation. The Gnostic, Priest, and Shaman all know this, and that is their mustard seed. They do not wonder or kind of believe something. They know – because they eat, sleep and live it every day. Do you know the Gnostic in you?

Share

Shamanism, core Shamanism, Christianity, and what is that?

I was reading a blog entry today about Shamanism which frustrated me. The writer of the blog definitely has their own ideas, and their own agenda. (No surprise there, I suppose.) Shamanism is not a religion, it is probably best described as one way of interacting with the world. Shamanism or Shamanistic practices is found in every major religion that I know of. So what has me riled up about the bog entry? Let me start from the beginning.

I am googling around, and I come across this blog as I said. I do not wish to attack the blog entry, or its author, so let me move the subject to a different topic, say Christianity? Just kidding, how about a card game, say some version of the card game Rummy? That sounds pretty safe to use Rummy for an analogy.

Okay, now you have to pretend you know, and maybe you do, that there are many variations of the card game Rummy. One day, an anthropologist with a fascination for the game of Rummy, decided to write a book about Rummy. The would be author finds many variations of Rummy. If they were all covered, the book would become so fractured and disjointed that no matter how it was written it would not be easy for the reader to understand.

After giving it some thought, the wanna be author finds a solution to his problem. The wanna be author will write about those parts of Rummy that all Rummy variations share. What a brilliant idea! Once the book is written there will always be a written core form of Rummy that is present no matter how it is played. If a Rummy game does not contain some of the core parts of Rummy shared in all other Rummy games, it is not a variation of Rummy, period.

This is a very simple and elegant solution to a complex problem. This same process could be applied to major religions around the world, how businesses are managed, almost anything that has more than one way of being done. All these things could be distilled down to basic parts that are common in the many parts.

Sounds pretty good having a book containing the core of something no matter how it is done? I thought it is pretty effective and quite smart too. So what is the rub? The rub is the same as it is everywhere, power and control. The blog author has decided that a book on core generic practices of Shamanism can not possibly be correct. What is correct in the authors opinion is Shamanism should only be practiced the way the blog author thinks it should be.

The details of this practice are a work in development, but contains little to no core Shamanism practices. If a Shamanistic practice does not contain portions of core Shamanism, then it is something else masquerading as Shamanism.

Christianity is a lot like the card game Rummy in some respects. Just like Rummy, Christianity has so many variations that I do not know how many variations exist. Each of these variations of Christianity feel they are the real deal, and the rest are some sort of knock off. But they all share some or most of the many core ideas found in Christianity.

So, Christianity can not be Christianity if you leave certain essentials like Christ out of the picture. The argument stating – the Shamanism the blog author is developing is correct, and any previous form of Shamanism is wrong – is clouded thinking. Just like Christianity, you can not leave out the core aspects Shamanism, and call it Shamanism. I see this author’s thinking as no different than entering a theatre in the second act of a play, stopping the play, and telling the actors they have it all wrong.

Whatever a person chooses to think, or not think is a correct personal choice. Once that thinking extends to what one, or a group of people claim is correct, and everyone else is wrong, is definitely wrong. Stating that core shared practices that have been used for thousands of years are wrong, and only a still developing system not using Shamanistic technique is right, is a different matter completely, and wrong in any format. This applies to Shamanism, Christianity, or any other major religion.

Share